Keith wrote:
Hello Michael,
testing 19 pairs? That must have taken some time

How many trades did you place in the week that you showed a 52% increase?
I did some extensive backtesting and real time testing of a similar strategy last year, but based on the Asian session being 10PM to 6AM UK time and just taking breaks of highs or lows with no discretion. It didn't work very well! I actually found the range between 10PM and 4AM UK time worked better.
I believe that you are right that you need to be able to recognise what is a better set-up. It is the skill and discretion of the individual trader that will make a mediocre strategy a winner.
Well done, looking like you can spot the better chart patterns

Good luck
Keith
Hi Keith
Yes, it took quite some time. I have done some coding to make it easier but there is still a lot of work to be done.
That week was 47 trades, with 7 hitting stop loss and 10 closing at breakeven - not a typical week I'm sure
I have also looked at taking the trades without filtering and it definitely doesn't work! I have been using the range between 10pm to 8am UK time. There are some setups which are definitely worse performers such as when it trends for the whole time. Perversely, when these ones do work they tend to reach higher multiples. I also think that when the previous day has been ranging there is much more chance of the trade triggering by a little then reversing and getting stopped out.
My strategy is to aim for 1:1 trades with stop moved to breakeven at 50%
I'm just getting back into this now as my youngest son has been quite ill but is now out of hospital and on medication. I'm trying to analyse each pair in turn to see if there is an optimal channel width, which patterns work best and also whether 1:1 is the best target. Shouldn't take more that a few thousand hours!
All the best
Michael