Hello everyone,
First of all, I totally agree with Joe.
When I first came here I was expecting an
educational service. Stating the obvious (at least with the most), education is related with
learning. To me (I'm a teacher), there's no learning if there's no chance to
apply the things learned.
And, of course, I have received exactly what I've expected: a great educational service that has been really useful in my trading style.
I don't place trades based on the signals (not in my real account). I just try to make sense of them: sometimes I received an answer from Vahid's analysis; sometimes I can see the reasoning behind it; sometimes I can't. But this is learning to me.
I follow Vahid's analysis everyday. And I make notes. And I try to integrate my new learnings with my own personal trading strategy. Sometimes a can do that; sometimes I can't.
I do my personal analysis everyday. And I try to include Vahid's reasoning before he posts his own. Sometimes I agree; sometimes I don't.
To me, to follow signals is not the way to achieve expertise. There's no learning involved.
Following signals is more related to another extraordinary skill: be able to copy/paste Vahid's levels and push the buy/sell button (no sarcasm intended). But there's no reasoning, no critical thinking at all in that particular activity. That's the way a trainer should train monkeys, not perfectly capable humans (sarcasm intended). That is just repetition; and, if we call that "learning", it's a very different level of it.
If there are less or more signals (or not at all) I'm just fine.
There's a comic paradox in the advice but, what the hell, I will say that too: Vahid, please do what you want to do.
If somebody doesn't like it, it's OK. There are so many signal services out there that they won't be depressed at all (maybe they will after they blow their account, but that's another story).
As there are some people here (I do think that we represent more than 1%, btw

) who want to learn from Vahid, we'll stay here with no doubt.
Stay well.