Keith wrote:
Are you saying that you issue less than perfect set-ups specifically for your clients to lose money in order to learn to distinguish between strong and weak trade setups?
I could almost understand this if you actually reviewed the winning and losing trades, but you haven't.
As I said in my previous post, you have found time to review trades that you claim to have taken where you have not previously posted any indication of the set-up at all, but you apparently have no time to review the snipers set-ups that you have posted.
No I am not saying this. I say I show the all the forming trade setups and tell them what risks each trade has. I also show the perfect trade setups and help the members to understand the difference of perfect and weak trade setups.
Keith wrote:
Yet in your recent videos there have been a few examples where you have claimed to have made winning trades in the smaller timeframes. Trades that have not been indicated to members until after you have made the profit. These must have been personal trades as they were not indicated, so do you personally trade the lower timeframes or not?
I was used to trade with smaller time frames long time ago. Then I started sharing the range breakout system with the members. When I share a system with the members, I also take the positions because I do not want to recommend something that I do not use.
Keith wrote:
The main aim of Forexoma is supposed to be education. I have seen little in the way of education lately. As I said before, You have taken me from a losing trader to a break-even trader. For that I thank you.
I feel that Forexoma has lost its way and has been going downhill since the start of this year when you introduced the videos. When the charts were posted on the daily report, they were easy to refer to and review.
Now you are issuing so many trade set-ups with-out any explanation. Often a break of support resistance that is just a connection of 2 high or low points. What happened to looking for confirmation in the higher time-frames?
Forex trading is not about learning something new everyday. It is all about learning one thing and then practicing and mastering it. You learn a system. You demo trade with it for several months and after building your confidence you start live trading. If you see I have taught a few systems, it is because we have different members with different styles and tastes and also different daily schedule. It doesn't mean that all members should trade with all the systems I share. The correct way is sticking to one system and learning it as much as you can. When I analyze the market on a daily basis, it is in fact the practice of the systems we learned. I should not teach a new system every day. I should help the members to practice the same systems.
Keith wrote:
If you do not believe in trading the lower time-frames, then why on earth are you posting videos based on the 5 minute charts? You have posted 2 today.
It is not the matter of believe. It is the matter of style and taste. I may not trade using some of the systems or time frames I teach. But I still teach them because - as I said - there are different members with different styles and it is their right to have what they want to learn.
Keith wrote:
I think that you should go back to how you were. Before the videos you posted well thought out trade set-ups that made sense and easy to read. The videos are not easy to follow and very distracting because you don't edit out when you change the colour of trend-lines or which time-frame that it is shown in. Making the videos must be time consuming for you and in my opinion have not been an improvement. Certainly a well presented video for educational reasons can be very good. But for trade set-ups, I think that you should go back to the old way of posting the charts on the reports.
Although I think most members prefer the videos, I will have the old style of posting the charts again, as well as the videos.
Keith wrote:
I still believe that you offer a valuable service to take a trader from beginner to intermediate. If you can take a trader beyond that level, then why not indicate the actual trades that you take personally. If they are all in the higher timeframes, you will have the time to post the set-ups. So what if it is only a handful of trades every month! It would be interesting to know what trades you actually take instead of a load of mediocre set-ups because that's what your students want.
There are always many trade setups that I take and I can not share, because market moves and it becomes too late to send the signals to the members. Long trade setup on EURCAD one hour chart that went up for over 300 pips was one of it. Unlike you, I think so far I have shown almost all of the trades that I have taken myself. Of course sometimes I takes some positions based on the news/signals that I receive from the other resources and I do not share them with the members.
Keith wrote:
The students should take guidance from their teacher, not the other way round.
If you actually trade and make good profits every month, share the details of these actual trades before the event. Tell us that these trades are lower risk, because you consistently make profits with them.
We only have your word that you make these huge profits every month. You once said that making 25% profit per month is not difficult. Why not prove it?
I still say that making 25% per months is
a piece of cake and can be done through taking only few positions per month. I do not have to share everything that I do with the members and show all the positions that I take. As I said I take so many other positions based on the news/signals I receive from some special resources. I am not allowed to share them with anybody. Here I have a special training program that I follow. A teacher may know thousands of things, but he only teaches the things that help the students more.
Attachment:
The attachment Statement.jpg is no longer available